What is the Virgin Gut?
Until around six months of age babies have what is often referred to as an “open gut”. This means the spaces between the cells of the small intestine will allow large molecules to pass directly into their bloodstream. Consequently, as well as the beneficial antibodies in breastmilk passing into baby's bloodstream, allergy-triggering proteins from other foods, disease-causing pathogens and other nasties can also pass through.
If breastmilk is all that has ever entered baby’s gut, it is often referred to as a “virgin gut”. Antibodies and other constituents of breastmilk create this unique environment (Wade 2010; Current Nutrition & Food Science 2012; Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2012). For instance, some of the sugars found in breastmilk promote the development of a substance called Lactobacillus bifidus, which makes the gut more acidic, thus helping to stop harmful bacteria from growing. Another substance found in breastmilk - Lactoferrin - binds with iron in your baby, thus starving harmful bacteria of the iron they need to multiply.
Furthermore, recent research has linked a component of breast milk called oligosaccharides (HMO for short) to the maintenance of the perfect virgin gut. Here's how it works: the human body does not possess the enzymes to break down HMO, so it passes through intact to the large intestines. HMO then produces short-chain fatty acids which beneficial bacteria feed on, thus maintaining a healthy population of microbial in the infant's intestines. But wait! It gets even more interesting, "As the baby grows older and its digestive patterns change, the breast milk automatically regulates the bacterial levels to maintain a healthy balance that suits the baby's evolving needs" (Khalfan Al Ghazal 2012). These beneficial bacteria strengthen the immune system so that in the long term it can fend off chronic health problems like food allergies and asthma (Donovan 2012; Chapkin 2012).
If you’re a combined feeder look away now.
Here comes the killer fact. Only small amounts of formula or solid foods cause a shift that destroys this environment, changing acidity and destroying the immunoglobulins that coat mucosal surfaces. “Just one formula supplement per 24 hours will result in an almost immediate shift from breastfed to formula-fed gut flora - in which good bacteria (Bifidobacteria) are no longer dominant” (Mackie, Sghir, Gaskins. Bullen, Tearle, Stewart). This means that your baby is more likely to develop allergies later on as your baby's gut becomes 'sensitized' (Lim 2009). The process has been described as follows:
“Infant formula contains milk proteins which strip the gut of its flora leaving it wide open to allergens. The milk proteins themselves are allergens and are able to pass freely into the baby’s bloodstream, so susceptible babies will react with common allergies such as asthma and eczema. Not all babies will be susceptible, but for those that are the invasion of allergens at such a young age can cause lifelong battles with allergies.”
That foreign proteins damage a young baby's immature gut was noted by the BBC in 2007 in an article about HIV transmission. Babies of mothers in developing countries who did not exclusively breastfeed were almost 11 times more likely to acquire the infection. "This higher risk is due to the larger, more complex proteins which may lead to greater damage to the lining of the stomach, allowing the virus to pass through the gut wall" (BBC).
More recently, researchers from Duke University grew bacteria in samples of infant formulas, cow's milk and breast milk. The infant formulas and the cow's milk were incubated with two strains of E. coli bacteria – helpful cousins to the dangerous organisms associated with food poisoning. Within minutes, the bacteria began multiplying in all of the specimens, but there was an immediate difference in the way the bacteria grew. In the breast milk, bacteria stuck together to form biofilms - thin, adherent layers of bacteria that serve as a shield against pathogens and infections. Bacteria in the infant formula and cow's milk proliferated wildly, but it grew as individual organisms that did not aggregate to form a protective barrier (Current Nutrition & Food Science 2012).
![]() |
| Clostridium difficile |
Even more shockingly, recent research has revealed that formula actually causes cell death, whereas breast milk does not. In the study, cells that line the intestine and blood vessels, along with white blood cells that control inflammation caused by trauma, were virtually eliminated during the process of digesting formula (you can read the study here).
How to recover your baby's gut
However, before you reach for the hangman’s noose, all is not lost. "Virgin" gut seems to suggest that once a baby’s gut has lost its virginity it can never get it back. This is misleading as such acute sensitivity only applies to the first seven days of life. Providing you gave your baby formula after this time, “if breastmilk is given exclusively again, thereafter it would take 2-4 weeks for the intestinal environment to return again to a state favouring Grampositive Flora” (Brown & Bosworth; Gerstley, Howell, Nagel). In other words, you can repair your baby’s gut if, like me, you ignorantly administered a formula top-up or two. Several weeks of exclusive breastfeeding should restore the “damage”. This means no water, formula or other complimentary foods. The Department of Health, Word Health Organisation and Unicef recommend maintaining the virgin gut for six months, after which solids can be introduced.
So let’s assume you’re a bona fide Alpha Parent and have maintained your baby’s virgin gut. Firstly, hark at you! I salute you. Secondly, be smug. It’s no mean feat exclusively breastfeeding when everyone around you (in-laws, friends, health visitors) are pressuring you with formula top-ups, juice and boiled water, as well as cracking open the
What about Calpol?
Or infacol or gripe water?
Some commentators argue that Calpol is of equal danger to formula measure for measure. However as baby isn’t given 200ml of Calpol at a time (I hope!) then formula is much more detrimental to the virgin gut than the odd 2.5ml/5ml of Calpol.
Other commentators maintain that only items containing foreign proteins or enzymes will damage the virgin gut. This is because only they penetrate the gaps between the cells of the wall of the intestines. Calpol, Infacol and the like are designed so they pass through the system unabsorbed (unlike milk protein) so technically they don't count.
Either way, the general consensus is that Calpol and other medicines do not ruin a baby’s virgin gut. The Word Health Organisation's definition of exclusive breastfeeding allows for vitamins, minerals and medicine.
However, Calpol has other problems. As a product, it contains E numbers which can trigger eczema in sensitive children. In fact, some forms of Calpol have been banned in the UK. An alternative to Calpol is soluble Disprol which is essentially pure paracetamol sans the pink additives.
What about bacteria, particles of soap, etc?
When I originally discovered the virgin gut theory my first thought was “I fail at life”. My second thought was “this is tripe”. Babies are constantly sucking on (not very clean) things and ingesting random items. I wondered whether the virgin gut research used a definition that meant “never had formula” or was it “never had anything but breastmilk”. Because if was the latter then it would be virtually impossible to guarantee and control between babies across any study. As a Mumsnet user elegantly put it, “I think my son's downfall was the day I caught him licking the dog.”
The answer to this conundrum is a fascinating one. Breastmilk flushes out viruses, bacteria, particles of dirt, and other small microbes while at the same time lining the gut to protect it against allergens and infections until it closes up at around 6 months. Anything other than breastmilk (food, formula, water, Calpol) will affect the virgin gut but the breastmilk will then re-coat the gut afterwards. This re-coating process may take a few days or weeks depending on the quantity of foreign product given. However the process is not without its limitations. If formula is given within the first week of a baby’s life, the gut may be too immature to repair itself, and virgin gut status may never be maintained.
So ultimately, how important is the virgin gut?
The idea of virginity, aka a clean slate, appeals to the Alpha Parent in us. It provokes perfectionist tendencies. Hands up if you have ever been on a diet and refused a crisp because it would ruin your fat-free clean slate. Even though one crisp would not damage your diet, there is a compelling drive to be flawless.
If a baby is born into a family with a history of allergies, their parents may want to pay particular heed to the virgin gut theory. Research suggests a link between the virgin gut and a lower incidence of allergies and food sensitivities. The theory is that the porous nature of the immature gut allows irritants to go straight through and cause a life-long over-reaction whenever that substance is encountered. Thus, just one bottle of formula can sensitize babies who may be allergic to cow's milk protein or soy protein. However, for the vast majority of babies, the idea of virginity is far less important than a baby's general health and comfort.
The significance of the virgin gut for you will depend on your family’s unique circumstances. When gauging its importance firstly consider the age of your baby - the value of the virgin gut diminishes with age. Next consider the amount of foreign substance introduced - 2.5mls disturbs gut flora to a much less degree than 6oz. Then consider what substance is introduced - water has less of an impact than Calpol; formula is an ideal growth medium for bad bacteria, and is consequently high risk. Next consider the potential for the substance to trigger allergy. Few people are allergic to water, but many people are intolerant of cow's milk. Finally consider necessity. If you are in the minority that need to top-up with formula for medical reasons (preemie baby or insufficient breast glandular tissue for example), the virgin gut can be sidelined. The situation is a matter of risk versus benefit analysis.
Always remember that failing to maintain the perfect virgin gut does not negate the bulk of breastfeeding benefits. Any amount of breastmilk, aka liquid gold, is significantly better than none.
For further information on the virgin gut, I urge you to read this article: “Just One Bottle Won’t Hurt” - or Will It?





I like this! Makes me feel better about breastfeeding for a year, even though I've had to stop (sort of..I still do it when I can!). Unfortunately it's now also put the words "my baby lost her virginity at 6 months old" into my head!
ReplyDeletehaha the word virginity in reference to babies is a bit iffy, but I think it was created to be emotive. Well done on making it to 6 months with a virgin gut. Most babies guts are far from honeymoon fresh by 6 months.
ReplyDeleteThis is brilliant! Thank you for writing such a fantastic post. I'll be linking to it for my Sharing Sunday this week :)
ReplyDeleteThank you for the compliment! I wanted to tackle the questions that frequently pop up when parents discuss the virgin gut. I'm glad you liked my post :)
ReplyDeleteWow! I've never heard if this but makes total sense!!! I'm suffering rating a dairy free gluten free diet at the moment for the sake of my 5mth old due to her intolerances to the proteins so hopefully after the 6 mth mark her gut will get stringer and she will be able to tolerate some stuff...her symptin's arent major she is thricing and happy just quite sensitive to alot of stuff I eat. Plus side, baby weight is dropping off me!! :)
ReplyDeleteARGH! sorry for the typo's - im not really that bogan! Typing one handed on an iphone whilst breastfeeding isnt the easiest but its when i catch up on my tweets/blogs etc!! =)
ReplyDeleteThankyou!! Am writting an article on formula feeding in relation to gut health...great blog <3
ReplyDeleteGah - I wish we hadn't needed to / were encouraged to supplement in my son's first few days and weeks. We've be EBF since he was 3 weeks old but before that supplemented with formula (thanks hospital interventions). With a family history of Crohn's I just hope his gut is ok in the long run.
ReplyDeleteExcellent writing!
ReplyDeleteCan you please tell what to do if mum has pregnancy diabetes? Hospital says they might need to use formula to feed baby before mum has milk...
All this to observe and maintain baby's sugar level.
I have a questions about this article. I have exclusively breastfed since day one. My baby is now 5 months and 1 week old and we've started some solids (mashed up banana and avacado) this past week (she loves them!!). However, from about age 2 weeks - 3.5 months it was an absolute nightmare. As I said I exclusively breastfed (no water, no formula, nothing despite "suggestions" from family and strangers). At first the doc thought it was colic, but when I mentioned that she cries all day unless she's being bounced, he then guessed it was acid reflux. They put her on two different meds for that and they didn't really work. I asked about milk protein issues (MSPI) and I was told that prob wasn't it, that it was acid reflux mixed with colic. Anyhow, I decided to switch my diet to eliminate all dairy and soy products (whey, casein etc, everything). About a month later she was a completely different baby, no more screaming all day, no more green mucousy poop, just a smiley baby :D Okay, so finally, my question being: did she not have a "virgin gut" even though I breastfed her solely during all that? Milk protein passes through the breast (obviously), so since she had shown ill effects from that, will that make her more prone to allergies do you think?
ReplyDelete@Norbee....in the hospital I work at diabetic mothers express some colostrum antenatally. The baby gets skin to skin and early feeding. Blood sugars are much more likely to stay normal because of this.
ReplyDeleteThanks for explaining this so well. Dd1 was supplementEd on medical advice from about 3 weeks old till 8 weeks (she lost too much weight) and I was very worried about the Virgin gut. I managed to get a good supply back and exclusively expressed for the remainder of her first year as she refused to bf.
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad she got her virgin gut back. We have asthma, eczema, diabetes and obesity in our family so breastmilk feeding was important to me.
Dd2 was exclusively bf till 5.5 months, then blw and is still bf at 18 months.
Now see, I don't like things like this. My daughter was born with a cleft palate and she had no way of gaining suction. She had to be put on to the Haberman special needs feeder while still in the hospital. I did pump out my breast milk for her but for 3 months she just was not gaining weight at all and I had 3 doctors telling me to put her on formula. I wanted her on my milk because everyone swears it is so good for babies. Well it wasn't good for mine since she had only hit 10 pounds at 3 months, she was so sick looking, and her kidneys wanted to start failing. I was on a good diet too, she just was not doing good on the breast milk. I switched her to formula and she was so happy. She started gaining (healthily) and got strong enough for her surgery that was scheduled for her when she hit 6 months. I have no doubt that if I had not put her on formula, she would have even more health problems or we could have even lost her. I'm glad they have those options out there.
ReplyDeleteI love this article. I agree 100%! I have 3 sons all EBF for 6 months, the solids introduced around 6-7months. My 2nd however went into special care nursery at hospital, and the nurse in there really hated me taking him out from under the lights (jaundice) to feed him, so even though I had signed the forms to say NO ARTIFICIAL BABY MILK (I was expressing too, there was heaps of my EB in the fridge) the cow fed him formula. Not just 10 mils, but like 60mils at a time, 2 or 3 a day for 3 days (like a 2 day old baby needs that much!!) every time I left the nursery. When I saw it on the last day in there I went off my nut, called in the head of maternity, told her what happened and the woman was in lots of trouble! They're lucky I didn't tale it further. I was SOOOOOOOO MAD!!!!
ReplyDeleteI can see now at 5 years old, his guts are still not as good as my other 2, he is my only one with food sensitivities. I BF him for over 2.5years, but still feel so horrible about him having the bottles in the nursery.
I'm not saying that some babies need artificial baby milk for medical reasons, as Laura states above, but for people who want 'me time' or 'dad to ba able to bond too' what a load of BS. Breast milk is the best, it is the most natural choice in the world, and formula IS full of junk.
I wish I'd read this during pregnancy. My 5 mo old was given formula in the hospital because of jaundice and weight loss (and unknown to me then, an upper lip tie). Looking back now, it was really unnecessary and I'd give anything to take that back and find a more competent LC. All the crazy things that were done and encouraged in my hospital, despite the constant mantra of "breast is best", is just appalling to me now, and I can't believe I'm still ebf at 5 mo after what they put us through. Whenever a friend gets pregnant, I send them here, Kellymom, and give them my "List of Scary Sh*t That's Perfectly Normal". Mine has cmp, soy, peanut, and gluten intolerances, despite the data suggesting that most of what you eat does not affect your bm. I chalk it up to that terrible experience of that nurse practically force-feeding him that bottle of formula even after he sweetly "drunken sailor-ed" off and was full and contented. I wish I hadn't been so easily bullied into failing to protect my child. Thank you for this site!
ReplyDeleteExcellent article. Thank you for this. I'm interested in information --- observational or especially research studies --- about recovery of infant gut after some formula supplementation. I see in the (1922 and 1932) references given here descriptions of acidity differences and realize maybe it's actually a rather valuable measure (and something that anyone could measure easily with litmus paper). I'd really love to see reports on color, consistency, and odor. Odor especially could tell the story of what's living in there. Any anecdotal stories with these observations would interest me since I don’t see solid studies on the full character changes of the flora or child’s health after return to exclusive breastmilk.
ReplyDeleteOf course today's new DNA sequencing techniques could give a much fuller story, while studies comparing the number and severity of infections would be the gold medal prize to me.
My focus of interest right now is the differences in immune protection. I’m always interested in allergies but the differences reported in studies between allergies in bf vs. ff are not large (though I believe that’s in large part from cow’s milk proteins passed through breastmilk) while differences in diarrheal and respiratory illnesses are huge.
I see the reference to Marsha Walker’s article “Just One Bottle,” which is one of the most important pieces of breastmilk information ever written. A reference recently given to me for this article is dated 2010, which interested me as I had read this article some 13 or 14 years ago, I believe. Maybe not quite that long ago. I was looking for the oldest version I could find, just now, as I didn’t remember seeing things that I saw today (as if I had that good a memory) and I came across a version with references including years up to 2007 --- a much newer version --- http://www.naba-breastfeeding.org/images/Just%20One%20Bottle.pdf --- than the on one posted on Jay Gordon’s website in 2010 (newest reference is 2000). I see that she keeps updating it. How wonderful. OK, I’m getting a little off-topic here. Anyway, I’m glad to be re-reading her and the updated version and there are several references I’m going to go digging into.
Thank you Linda. Very useful.
DeleteWow. As a food and intestinal flora , I'm seriously impressed by the amount of research you incorporated in your article and the clear way you explain this quite elaborate subject. Kudos!
ReplyDeleteJust one extra piece of information: gut colonisation starts at birth. When mum's gut flora isn't all that, or when a child is born with a C-section, first colonisation will go suboptimal. The gut environment will then stay oxygen-rich, meaning not optimal for Lactobacillus-species.
So even though a baby's gut is maintained 'virgin', that's no guarantee the gut flora and gut lining will be optimal. This is why I'd urge women to get their gut flora (and status of vitamins and fatty acids) tested, as part of their pre-pregnancy routine.
But that's a whole different blog post ;-)
Kind regards,
Nienke Tode-Gottenbos
De Groene Vrouw
Netherlands
I found this while looking for references to write something similar, now I can just re-share this instead, thanks.
ReplyDelete